Aspect ratios and cutdowns: one production, every platform

A vertical cut is not a cropped horizontal one. Planning for both at the start costs almost nothing; retrofitting it costs about a third of the production again.

Fresvo5 min read
A hand holding a phone recording video of a forest

The single most common avoidable cost in video is discovering, after delivery, that the film needs to exist in three more shapes. It is avoidable because the decision that creates the problem is made on day one, and it is expensive because a vertical version of a horizontal film is not a crop. It is a re-edit.

What each ratio is for

RatioWhere it runsNotes
9:16 verticalReels, TikTok, Stories, ShortsFull screen on a phone. The highest-attention format there is, and the least forgiving.
1:1 squareFeed posts, some display placementsThe safe middle. Rarely the best anywhere, rarely wrong anywhere.
4:5 portraitInstagram and Facebook feedTakes more feed height than square without demanding a full-screen commitment. Often the best feed performer.
16:9 horizontalYouTube, websites, email, presentationsStill the default for anything watched deliberately rather than encountered.
2.39:1 wideBrand films, cinema, title sequencesA stylistic choice, not a platform requirement. Loses a lot of height when repurposed.

Most brands need three: 9:16 for anything full-screen on a phone, 4:5 or 1:1 for feed, and 16:9 for the site and everything else.

Why cropping does not work

Take a 16:9 frame and crop it to 9:16 and you keep about 30 percent of the picture. What you throw away is usually the composition.

  • Two-shots collapse. Anything with two people or a subject and a product loses one of them.
  • Type breaks. Titles laid out for a wide frame either overflow or shrink to unreadable.
  • Headroom goes wrong. A face framed for horizontal sits badly in vertical, and the crop cannot invent the room above it.
  • Motion leaves frame. A pan designed for a wide plate exits a narrow one early.
  • Safe areas differ. Platform interface elements sit over the top and bottom of a vertical frame, and a crop puts your subtitles under them.
The interior of a cinema with a wide screen
Wide framing is a composition, not a container. Cropping it discards the part that made it work.Photo, Augusto Oazi

Planning for every format from the start

The cheap approach is to decide the format set before production, then build so that each output is a reframe rather than a rescue.

  1. Name the outputs in the brief. Which ratios, which durations, which placements. This one line changes how everything gets shot or built.
  2. Shoot or generate with room. Frame slightly wider than the horizontal needs, so the vertical reframe has picture to work with. In animation, build the composition larger than the delivery frame.
  3. Keep the subject off dead centre in a way that survives both. Composition that works at both extremes is a real constraint and a solvable one.
  4. Keep type on its own layers. Titles get laid out per ratio. If they are baked into the plate, every ratio is a rebuild.
  5. Leave safe margins. Roughly 10 percent top and bottom in vertical for platform interface.
  6. Cut the shortest version first. If the 15-second cut works, the 60 is an expansion. The reverse rarely holds.

Duration, by placement

Cutdowns are not just shorter. Each length has a different structural job.

LengthJobWhat it contains
6sBumper. One idea.Hook and logo. Nothing else fits.
15sThe workhorse for paid social.Hook, one mechanism, one call to action.
30sThe standard ad.Hook, mechanism, proof, call to action.
60sSite hero and announcement.The full argument, with context.
90s+Brand film, keynote, deliberate viewing.Story, characters, a slower build.

Captions, and where to put them

Captions are not an accessibility afterthought; they are the default reading mode for a large share of the audience. Three rules that survive every platform.

  • Burn them in for social, keep an SRT for the site. Burned-in captions cannot be turned off, which is the point; a sidecar file keeps the site version searchable and switchable.
  • Keep them out of the bottom fifth in vertical. That band belongs to the platform's own interface, and captions placed there get covered.
  • Style them. Platform auto-captions look identical across every brand using them, which makes yours look like everyone else's for no reason.
A wall of television screens showing different pictures
One production, several shapes. The difference between a format set and a set of compromises is decided before anything is built.Photo, Coline Haslé

A delivery checklist

  1. Master in the highest resolution the project supports, graded, with captions as a separate file.
  2. 9:16 at 1080 by 1920, burned-in captions, safe margins respected.
  3. 4:5 or 1:1 for feed, reframed rather than cropped.
  4. 16:9 for site and email, with a poster frame exported.
  5. Each ratio in the durations the media plan actually calls for.
  6. Frame exports as stills, for press, social and email.
  7. Source files, so the next cutdown does not start from a render.

That last item is worth asking about before signing anything, how to choose a video production company covers the other terms that are easier to agree early than to renegotiate later, and pricing covers what a full format set should add to a quote.

Common questions

What aspect ratio should my video be?
Most brands need three: 9:16 for full-screen phone placements like Reels, TikTok and Stories; 4:5 or 1:1 for feed posts; and 16:9 for the website, email and presentations. Which one leads should be decided by where the media budget is going.
Can you just crop a 16:9 video to vertical?
Not well. A 9:16 crop of a 16:9 frame keeps about 30 percent of the picture, which usually discards the composition: two-shots collapse, titles break, headroom goes wrong and motion leaves frame early. A proper vertical version is a reframe, not a crop.
How much do extra aspect ratios cost?
Planned into the production from the start, a full format set typically adds 15 to 25 percent. Retrofitted after delivery it commonly costs 40 to 60 percent of the original production, because it is a re-edit against decisions that are already locked.
Should captions be burned in or a separate file?
Both. Burn them in for social, where they cannot be switched on by the viewer and most playback is muted, and supply an SRT sidecar for the website and YouTube, where a separate file stays searchable and can be toggled.

Keep reading